Opinion editor’s note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
I read with interest the July 8 column by Star Tribune journalist Karen Tolkkinen (“Rep. Fischbach, take our questions.”)
Tolkkinen unfairly criticizes Seventh District Republican U.S. Rep. Michelle Fischbach and compares her unfavorably to her untested Republican opponent, Steve Boyd, and her predecessor, former Seventh District DFL Rep. Collin Peterson.
The article was dripping with sarcasm and inconsistencies as Tolkkinen touted the strengths of both Peterson and Boyd. While she criticized federal agricultural policy as favoring corporate farming and as having “shuttered so many Minnesota farms,” she fails to cite the pivotal role played by Peterson himself in making this happen.
It was Peterson who chaired the House Agriculture Committee where five-year U.S. farm bills are authored and written. Peterson played a key role in advancing large corporate agriculture interests in Congress, and agriculture PACs contributed millions of dollars to his re-election campaigns. Peterson’s record here was a key factor in why Fischbach defeated the 30-year incumbent in 2020.
Tolkkinen also raised an irrelevant issue when she stated, “Boyd is handsome and articulate with an underlying steeliness.” How relevant is that statement when we are dealing today in Congress with critical and potentially catastrophic problems and issues of national and international importance?
When I asked Boyd earlier this year at a Morrison County Republican meeting why he was running for Congress against Fischbach — the most conservative member among the four-member Minnesota House Republican delegation, and who has the strong endorsement of Donald Trump — Boyd conceded these facts but stated that it was more important to elect an “outsider” like himself as representative of “grassroots government.”