As the school year opens, educators have a unique opportunity to harness collective interest in equity and inclusivity. As a mother, a wife in a cross-cultural marriage, a pediatrician and a physician educator, I am hopeful that teaching equity can uplift our communities and dismantle systems of oppression.
This is why I am disappointed in Katherine Kersten's commentary, "When schools teach 'equity,' kids learn fear and anger" (Opinion Exchange, Aug. 29).
I agree with Kersten that existing equity education is imperfect. True equity pedagogy is more than "focusing only on bad things" like deficit-based portrayals of minority groups. Educators must work to develop sophisticated curricula that reflect this complexity.
Yet Kersten's overgeneralizations about equity education prevent progress. Perhaps if she had used reasoned analysis and sought counterevidence to examine her fear of equity education, her critique would have been more thoughtful and well-informed.
Fortunately, there is a large body of literature on equity education, much of which shows potential for positive change. I urge you to consider three valuable lessons that we can learn from equity, in place of Kersten's imprecise application of Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "three great untruths":
The first lesson: Life is an opportunity for people to uplift humanity together.
Far from a simplistic battle between good and evil, equity posits that individuals are multidimensional and that we can find commonality within these dimensions.
There is a common misconception that equity ends at racial equity. In fact, we each have many identities such as age, gender and disability that convey varying levels of advantage in our society. Legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw introduced the term intersectionality to describe how people experience privilege and discrimination in different ways because of coexisting identities.