I read with some consternation the Aug. 11 commentary by Mike Meyers proclaiming multiple victories in his war on cars.
Meyers states with a certain smugness (his word, not mine) that he lives a carless life. Unfortunately, his list of choices — to retire, live downtown and have no children — is not how the other 99% of Minnesotans live.
The anti-car movement is decidedly anti-family, anti-job and anti-progress. For instance, the new Minneapolis ordinance banning the creation of new drive-throughs does not take into account the inconvenience or safety issues for parents with children who need to be strapped into car seats — or the needs of handicapped drivers.
Anti-car zealots hail the decision not to allow the Federal Reserve its parking ramp — and ignore the fact that it only means people will circle downtown Minneapolis searching for parking, negating any perceived environmental gain.
The anti-car sentiment is also incongruous with the desire of Minneapolis to house three professional sports teams and a convention center. Hundreds of millions of public dollars were spent on these regional attractions. The city fought to have them placed within its borders. Now city leaders want to start blocking access and eliminating parking options and create an unfriendly downtown driving environment?
For the vast majority of Minnesotans, jobs require cars. When I recently toured a Minneapolis nonprofit that repairs vehicles for the working poor, I was stunned to learn that the garage of five stalls has a six-month waiting list.
Certainly, public transit has a role in our state, and we auto dealers — whom I represent through industry associations — have never lobbied against transit in any form. But the simple fact is that transit is not always convenient or simply does not go where jobs are.
Minnesotans deserve choices in transportation. From trains to scooters, everything should be on the table. But the first thing we need to acknowledge is that most Minnesotans have chosen to use an automobile to conduct their affairs. Empowering people who believe it's their mission to make that choice as inconvenient as possible means we are sanctioning a battle with progress itself.