Early November in Minnesota, we moved our clocks back to standard time. We finally ended the stretch of eight months of the so-called daylight saving time (DST) rule. Back to standard time, when clocks say noon in the winter, the sun is actually close to its highest point (solar noon). Happily we can say that the standard time of Minnesota is a natural standard time.
Where was the Star Tribune this spring when a bill about clocks had little debate and passed in a budget bill? In May, a Minnesota bill passed and could catapult us soon into permanent DST. Some refer to it as a "Dark Mornings Bill." Bill HF72/SF149 was created in January and handled with little scientific and public oversight. I testified against it to advocate for the better choice of standard time. But the bill was inserted last minute into an omnibus budget bill and was passed, pending federal authorization for such a change.
This November, Minnesota still went back to its natural standard time because the federal law currently protects standard time. But in 2022 things could be different. The federal protective law could be changed by bills such as the one calling itself "Sunshine Protection Act" authored by U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida. Rubio, a Republican, has managed to have support from Democrats. On Nov. 4 he wrote his bill into an amendment of a defense budget bill about to be voted.
But then on Nov. 10, the Star Tribune's opinion editors published an "Other Views" editorial by the Miami Herald that sided with Rubio's bill and facts.
To fix the problems created by time changes, the editorial proposes to extend DST year-round and argues that the pros outweigh the cons. No words that the problems and the time changes were created by DST. Few words about the cons during the eight months of current seasonal DST. No words about cons that would appear during the four months it would take over. No mention of the 1974 failed experiment of DST in the winter that was quickly pulled back. It was tragic in terms of gloom and kids riding to school in the dark. The expected energy savings were not really seen.
More and better information should be published.
About health, a large scientific coalition publicly supports permanent standard time vs. DST. Standard time gives better access to daylight, morning daylight first, and helps sleep and health.