Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
No matter where we live, what we look like, or how we pray, Minnesota citizens deserve a voice in determining who represents us and how we address the challenges and opportunities in front of us.
We are stronger as a state when more of us raise our voices and participate in our democracy. Most Minnesotans agree with this core value, and we know it is a bedrock principle of our democracy.
By passing the Democracy for the People Act, the Legislature this year established a number of nonpartisan, pro-voter policies that strengthen our democracy, bringing in more eligible voters. Emeritus Carleton Prof. Steven Schier's recent commentary, "How DFLers kept legislating until Minnesota turned blue" (Opinion Exchange, May 21), is a hot take of punditry that sees only through a partisan lens.
Schier is an established commentator on Minnesota politics. It is disappointing to see a political-science professor making an argument based on partisan speculation and not fact.
Schier completely loses sight of the bedrock principle of strengthening participation in our democracy. He suggests at the end of the article the "DFL got away with a lot" in this legislative session. Increasing participation in our democracy is not some form of underhanded trick. Increasing participation is what will protect our democracy. After the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, protecting our democracy is exactly what voters demanded our lawmakers do.
Schier suggests that how these policies were passed violated the norm established by past governors that electoral reforms had to have bipartisan support. The real question we should be asking is why one party refused to support nonpartisan, pro-voter, pro-democracy policies.