Minneapolis can proceed with implementing its 2040 Comprehensive Plan without conducting an environmental study, the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled Monday.
In an opinion written by Judge James Florey, the court said that three groups failed in their attempts to block the plan on the grounds that it violated state laws designed to protect the environment.
Those groups — Smart Growth Minneapolis, the Audubon Chapter of Minneapolis and Minnesota Citizens for the Protection of Migratory Birds — didn't "show that adoption of the plan is likely to materially adversely affect the environment," Florey wrote.
He also wrote that the city was exempt from an environmental review required for other projects under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act.
Judge Carol Hooten joined Florey's opinion. Judge Matthew Johnson agreed with the court's ultimate ruling, but disagreed with a part of the legal analysis.
Together, the judges' ruling backs up an earlier decision from Hennepin County District Judge Joseph Klein, who dismissed the case.
The groups who sued the city invoked a different law, the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act, and argued that Minneapolis' comprehensive plan was "likely to cause the pollution, impairment, or destruction of the air, water, land or other natural resources located within the state."
The city had argued that the 2040 Plan is broad and conceptual, and each individual construction project will undergo its own review.