On the eve of former Brooklyn Center police officer Kimberly Potter's trial, the City Council voted down a measure to enact an emergency curfew after the verdict.
Two council members voted Monday night against the proposal, which required a unanimous vote to pass. Three others voted for the measure.
Some people who spoke before the council questioned whether enacting the curfew before the trial even began would send a signal that the council had already decided how residents would react and that they were expecting the worst.
The proposal called for a citywide curfew from 9:30 p.m. to 6 a.m. the day the verdict was read.
It would have given the city manager the power to extend the curfew for four additional days if he determined it was needed to protect "public health, safety, or welfare," according to the ordinance.
Mayor Mike Elliott said he ultimately voted against the measure because an emergency curfew should be imposed by an elected official, according to the city's charter. A curfew can be called by the mayor or with an unanimous vote by the council.
"Giving that to a nonelected city administrator I think is not in alignment with the city charter," he said.
Council member Marquita Butler said she thought the council could assess the situation and make a decision about a curfew if and when protests take place.