Over the last several years, as a resident of Minneapolis, I've watched the ebb and flow of several waves of public outrage concerning our police department. I'm politically active, and I believe that democracy is the best tool to fix things. But each cycle, I've noticed that not everyone agrees on the basics of this process.
We try to enact reforms and rules for the Minneapolis Police Department, but none of them stick.
When we tried to reduce no-knock warrants, police started carrying out more.
We put cameras on officers, but they hide the footage.
We ban police from getting violent "warrior training," and the Fraternal Order of Police pays for officers to get it on their own time.
When they feel criticized by the public, they walk away from their responsibilities, but we have to keep paying them anyway.
As much airtime as anti-democracy radicals have taken up in politics in recent years, most of Minneapolis, like most of America, wants the same thing: a fair, democratic system, where we all operate by the same rules. The problem doesn't come down to any specific rules or leaders. The issue is that Minneapolis police don't believe they're subject to democracy.
That's a reality that makes me fear, deeply, for the future of law and order in our city. The people we count on in tough times, to whom we call in tense situations and in the aftermath of horrors, think that nobody should tell them what to do, and that no rules should apply to them.