Derek Chauvin is scheduled for sentencing on June 16 for the murder of George Floyd last year, and juror identities will remain secret for six more months, a judge ordered Friday.
The fired Minneapolis police officer was convicted Tuesday of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in Floyd's death; Floyd was pinned to the pavement under Chauvin's knee for more than nine minutes on May 25 at 38th and Chicago. Sentencing is set for 1:30 p.m. in Hennepin County District Court.
Also Friday, Judge Peter Cahill ordered that the jurors' identities remain under seal for at least six more months, along with the list of prospective jurors, juror questionnaires and the unredacted verdict forms containing the foreperson's signature.
Cahill cited "ubiquitous and omnipresent" news media coverage along with intense public interest in keeping the 14 jurors' identities private. However, he added, the jurors have been told they may identify themselves if they wish and speak with whomever they like about their experience.
"The lawyers have reported receiving unprecedented levels of e-mails regarding this case, frequently of incendiary, inflammatory and threatening nature," Cahill wrote in his order. "The Court itself has received unprecedented levels of e-mails and telephone calls about this case."
The judge concluded that "continuing restrictions on public disclosure of jurors' identities remain necessary to protect those jurors deciding to remain anonymous from unwanted publicity or harassment."
In a prepared statement, Leita Walker, an attorney representing a coalition of local and national media, said the coalition "has nothing but respect and gratitude for the service these jurors performed and understands that they may need time to decompress."
"But part of understanding the administration of justice is understanding the people who hand down verdicts," she wrote. "And that's more important — not less — in a trial like this one. This Court has been a model of transparency throughout trial and we hope it gives the press a chance to be heard on this important issue, consistent with the First Amendment."