Just two months after moving to a farm in Minnesota, Morgan LaSalle got pregnant and made a discovery about her new home in Onamia — its hospital didn't deliver babies.
Online research put her at ease, as she found birthing centers to the northwest in Brainerd, to the east in Mora, and to the south in Princeton and St. Cloud. But none was closer than 30 miles. And the California transplant was going to be due in February, in her first full-blown Minnesota winter.
"I was a little nervous about that," she said.
LaSalle's experience exemplifies rural obstetrics in Minnesota: There are still options, but they are diminishing and leaving expecting mothers with concerns and risks.
A report released Wednesday reveals Minnesota to be a paradox in rural obstetric care. No state has had more hospitals stop delivering babies in the past decade. And yet, Minnesota still has a higher rate of rural hospitals providing obstetrics (OB) per women of childbearing age than almost any other state, according to research by the Chartis Center for Rural Health in Massachusetts.
Presenting the data in Washington, D.C., Chartis' Michael Topchik said Minnesota's top status is a dubious honor.
"Only 46 percent of rural hospitals provide OB," Topchik said. "So the fact that Minnesota is the best means you're the … best of something bad."
Insurance or accreditation standards have forced many small hospitals to surrender baby deliveries — even though they're a beloved community service — because their doctors don't perform enough to be considered competent, or because they aren't close enough to large hospitals able to perform emergency C-section deliveries.