As state leaders grapple with a historic deficit, the great debate at the Capitol is coming down to an jarring collision between education and health care -- two hungry giants of the state budget that together devour 70 percent of its spending.
Faced with a Sophie's Choice over which of their top priorities to sacrifice, DFLers, to the astonishment of some, are recommending flat funding for schools or even a significant cut in order to preserve some safety net for the old, poor and disabled.
Meanwhile, Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty has made his choice clear, dangling a slight increase to education while slicing deeply into health care.
The result has Democrats fighting and coming under friendly fire.
Behind closed doors at a recent caucus meeting, Rep. Mindy Greiling, the K-12 Finance Division chairwoman, bluntly informed longtime colleague Tom Huntley, DFL-Duluth, the House's leading voice on health care, that she would not carry a bill with outright cuts to education.
"That's when the shrieking started," said Greiling, DFL-Roseville.
When the caucus was over, the House recommended a zero increase to K-12, cuts to health care and $1.5 billion in tax increases. It was the sort of all-spinach budget plan DFLers say is needed in contrast to Pawlenty's approach, which they say takes an easy path but paves the way to even deeper future debt.
Within hours, the president of the state teachers' union, Tom Dooher, blasted the House plan as hurtful to schools and days later denounced it openly to a meeting of 700 union members. The union is one of the most influential parts of the DFL coalition and a reliable generator of both campaign foot soldiers and contributions.