A safety net health care provider has won a $10.3 million interim arbitration judgment against Eagan-based Prime Therapeutics over price-fixing allegations between the local pharmacy benefits manager and a rival firm.
The AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), which provides pharmacy services to patients with HIV in states across the country, alleged in a 2023 complaint that Prime Therapeutics fixed its prices to lower payment rates set by Express Scripts Inc. and thereby shorted the nonprofit pharmacy millions of dollars when it filled patient prescriptions.
After a seven-day arbitration hearing last August, an arbitrator ruled this month that Prime had engaged in price-fixing with Express-Scripts in violation of federal and state laws, and barred the two companies from collaborating on how Prime provides drugs and pricing to AHF. The ruling does not apply to other entities that get services from Prime, the company said.
AHF, based in Los Angeles, said Prime Therapeutics lowered its payment rates shortly after announcing a “collaborative” agreement with Express Scripts in late 2019 that was touted as making care more affordable.
Prime and Express Scripts are two of the country’s largest pharmacy benefit managers, which are companies that structure drug benefits within patient health plans, including the pharmacy networks where patients can fill prescriptions.
“Prime has not shown that the pro-competitive benefits are material enough to offset the substantial anticompetitive impacts of the collaboration,” arbitrator Stuart Widman wrote in a Jan. 17 ruling. “AHF has shown that the collaboration was and is an unreasonable restraint of trade and ... has proven its antitrust injury in the form of reduced revenues, as well as antitrust injury to the market.”
The pharmacy benefit manager industry has been embroiled in controversy over the past year amid allegations that companies’ covert business practices increase consumer costs while running independent pharmacies out of business — allegations that pharmacy benefit managers vigorously deny. Critics are pushing for reforms in Congress even as the industry is pushing back against regulatory efforts in Minnesota and other states.
The ruling found the collaboration was a price-fixing agreement that impacted Prime’s pricing of reimbursements, not just to AHF but to the industry.