Opinion editor’s note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
More than 8% of Minnesota babies are born to women living in rural counties. Just 3.7% of maternity care providers, however, practice in these areas.
It’s a troubling medical care imbalance, one documented by the most recent March of Dimes state-by-state maternity care report. Unfortunately, it’s one that’s likely to widen as hospital systems in Minnesota and elsewhere continue to consolidate services.
Too often, labor and delivery is care that small counties and communities lose when hospital systems group together certain services at one large facility to improve efficiency, control costs and grapple with the ongoing difficulty of recruiting medical specialists. Essentia Health’s announcement earlier this year that it intends to stop delivering babies at the Fosston, Minn., hospital is a recent example of this, with moms expected to travel to Detroit Lakes or Fargo to deliver.
Fortunately, Minnesota lawmakers have an opportunity this session to pass a pragmatic measure that could help remedy maternity care shortages in rural communities and other medically underserved areas. Lawmakers should ensure that this important measure, one that could expand the state’s maternity care workforce, is included in legislative packages approved during final days.
In turn, having more trained midwives would increase the pool of people who could be recruited to provide reproductive health care in underserved communities. That’s important with the March of Dimes reporting that 17 counties in the state are “maternity care deserts.”