Same old band, new stadium.
The Rolling Stones played the godforsaken Metrodome three times, Target Center, Xcel Energy Center, the old St. Paul Civic Center (also three times) and Met Center — and even the long-gone Danceland at the defunct Excelsior Amusement Park way back when they released their first U.S. album in 1964.
On June 3, the world's oldest, richest and greatest rock 'n' roll band will rock TCF Bank Stadium at the University of Minnesota — the boys' first local stadium gig since 1997.
Here is everything you wanted to ask about the Stones in their 53rd year.
Why should we still care?
Because they are still the best rock 'n' roll band in the world — at least in concert. Honestly. On a good night. Of course, you could say that about several other bands. But the Stones grabbed the title first and have done enough to keep it.
Superior musicianship, a surfeit of great songs, a rock-as-showbiz attitude, eternal cool and the frontman who defined what it is to be a rock star on and offstage — and never lost it. When I saw Mick Jagger in concert two years at Chicago's United Center, he was as exciting as he was the first time I saw him at Met Center in 1972.
Weren't you cynical about the Stones not too long ago?
Yes, indeed. I get cynical about classic acts that don't bother to make new albums but can't resist the reunion paychecks — Crosby, Stills & Nostalgia, the Grateful Done and the Two, who used to be the Who but only two of them are still alive. When was the last time those groups made a recording of new music?
On the other hand, it's easy to admire Bob Dylan, Paul McCartney, Neil Young, Bruce Springsteen and Prince because they challenge themselves — and their fans — by creating music even if it doesn't often measure up to their Hall of Fame standards. However, one could argue that they are solo artists who work with bands rather than members of a band.