The partisan divide was apparent on the face of every Minnesota lawmaker gathered for the private meeting at the State Capitol in June.
It was the closing hours of the last special session and the group of dealmakers remained at odds on the intricacies of police reform. But before negotiations even began, there was a stark contrast: Every Democrat entered the room with a face covering; but not one Republican wore a mask.
The face mask — a basic item health officials consider a simple precaution against the spread of COVID-19 — has become a symbol of political division across the state and the nation.
Now, as Gov. Tim Walz mulls a statewide mask mandate, state and local government leaders are weighing their response. A decision could come in a matter of days, as state lawmakers return to St. Paul for another special session to consider his emergency powers.
"It's another symptom of the political polarization that we have. The moment Trump said he didn't want to wear a mask it became a big deal," said Rep. Pat Garofalo, R-Farmington, referring to President Donald Trump's reluctance to wear a face covering. "A statewide mandate will probably encourage some people to wear a mask, but other people are going to ignore it," added Garofalo, who has donned a mask at the Capitol.
On Saturday, the president publicly wore a mask for the first time during a visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Washington, D.C.
As COVID-19 cases have spiked elsewhere in the U.S., mask wearing has shot to a record high. A national Gallup poll from late June found 86% of adults reported using one in the previous week. That's up from 51% in April.
If Walz does opt for a mandate, Minnesota would join Democratic and Republican governors of more than 20 other states that have required masks in public. In Minnesota, a number of cities from Minneapolis to Winona have already enacted local requirements.