When Dan Janski, a 30-year-old farmer from South Haven, Minn., planted cover crops on his family’s Stearns County farm in 2016, he said it was a eureka moment.
“My experience with climate-smart financial assistance really was a light bulb effect,” Janski said. “One idea just sparked another.”
Janski, a fourth-generation crop farmer, said he uses cover crops to reduce erosion and capture as much water as he can, preventing runoff. In his words, it’s been “better by the land, better by wildlife.”
That experimentation was given a nudge from Uncle Sam when $20 billion was earmarked for climate-smart ag programs as a part of the $1 trillion Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). So when some lawmakers in Congress recently suggested those climate-smart funds be doled out more broadly to any type of farming endeavor, Janski and others raised the alarm.
“Most of what they want to reduce is funding that supports conservation practices,” Janski said. “I just don’t think enough farmers have utilized them to understand [the programs].”
Elected representatives in Washington, D.C., are wrangling over whether any new farm bill should repurpose climate dollars given farmers by the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the IRA.
When the law passed in the fall of 2022, the IRA deposited $20 billion to so-called “climate smart” agriculture programs, including within the Natural Resources Conservation Service, a voluntary, working-lands program that pays farmers and ranchers to upgrade equipment or take on new techniques that both help the environment and keep an operation running.
Now some members of Congress, including the House Agriculture chair, Rep. Glenn “G.T.” Thompson, a Pennsylvania Republican, say farmers should have access to any unspent dollars to use for programs beyond those designated by USDA as “climate-smart.”