The fate of a man accused of masterminding a plot to bomb a Minnesota mosque is now in the hands of a jury.
Prosecutors and defense attorneys gave closing arguments Tuesday in the trial of Michael Hari, 49, capping off two and a half weeks of testimony in St. Paul's federal courthouse, plus a two-week delay mid-trial for quarantine after a juror tested positive for COVID-19.
The trial amplified ideological and political rifts over changes in the American way of life that have divided the nation in recent years. Prosecutors say Hari, of Clarence, Ill., viewed rise of Islam and influx of immigration as threats to American culture. Feeling left behind by a changing world, he believed the country required correction through violent revolution, prosecutors said.
A supporter of President Donald Trump, Hari poured his money into a pitch to build the U.S.-Mexico border wall, which Hari viewed as a symbol of the endurance of American values that must be protected from outsiders. In 2017, Hari graduated from violent rhetoric to violent action, spending weeks planning the bombing of Dar Al-Farooq mosque in Bloomington.
"Michael Hari believes that America is a country for white Christians," said Assistant U.S. Attorney John Docherty in closing arguments.
After the bombing, Hari and his militia, the "White Rabbits," attempted to bomb a clinic that performed abortions in Champaign, Ill., but the homemade explosive failed, according to prosecutors. Hari authored a manifesto and appeared in YouTube videos under the name "Illinois Patriot," describing government corruption, deep state actors and the need for a militant action to get the country back on track. The White Rabbits also planned but never carried out moneymaking schemes to fund their actions, including traveling to Cuba to capture the aunt of dead rapper Tupac Shakur, who is on the FBI's most-wanted list, and turn her in for a $1 million reward.
Hari pleaded not guilty to the five federal charges, including interfering with the free practice of religion by force and conspiracy to commit felonies using explosives. He did not testify. Throughout the trial, Hari's federal defenders argued that prosecutors lacked evidence placing Hari at the scene of the bombing. Defense attorney Shannon Elkins challenged the credibility of two key witnesses who testified to helping Hari carry out the mosque attack, calling them "lying snitches" who testified in hopes of avoiding decades in federal prison.
"The truth is often more complicated and messy than what we might prefer," Elkins said in closing arguments. "The government here is aiming to get a conviction. But the truth isn't picking the story you like more ... It's looking at all the evidence and using your brain and using your open mind to hear everything."