Austina Geiger moved to Isanti two years ago from Roseville, where she enjoyed shopping at a Total Wine & More outlet and wondered whether she would have to make a 36-mile trip back to it for bargains on wine.
Not long after arriving, she asked John Jacobi, manager at the municipal-owned Isanti Liquor, if he could stock Double Dog Dare boxed wine, which she used to pay $12 for at Total Wine. Jacobi ordered the wine and priced it several dollars cheaper.
"He was not only competitive but undercut Total Wine's price," Geiger said. "I was amazed."
Six years after the arrival of the Total Wine superstore chain in the Twin Cities, the region's liquor retail business has been upended. Now with eight locations around the Twin Cities, Total Wine's vast selection and ultralow pricing drove some competitors out of business and dented the financial performance of many others. The victims included city-owned stores whose proceeds allowed local officials to boast of keeping tax collections down.
Now a surprising turn can also be seen. Thanks to a quirky Minnesota liquor law, some liquor stores in the state have found a way to beat Total Wine at its own game. The law requires that all alcohol products must be made available to all retailers in the state, including the private labels that Total Wine uses to drive its highly profitable business model. The result: all Minnesota's liquor stores could stock the wines and spirits that Total Wine sells exclusively in most other markets.
"Total Wine helped me tremendously," Jacobi, the Isanti Liquor manager, said.
When a customer wanted Marchese Dell'Elsa Moscato d'Asti, which Total Wine sells for $13, Jacobi ordered it and found he could price it at $8 and still make a good profit. "I'm building customer loyalty and still making my normal 50% markup," he said.
Ed Cooper, a spokesman for Total Wine, declined to comment on its pricing or competition in Minnesota. "Much of what you ask is proprietary information that we would rather our competitors not know," he said.