While its police force may be on the smallish side, Anoka is arguably one of the most guarded places around.
That's because the suburb about 40 minutes north of the Twin Cities is home to 27 Minneapolis police officers, nearly outnumbering the town's 29-member department.
Another 29 Minneapolis cops reside in nearby Andover, which doesn't have its own police department.
In fact, Minneapolis police officers living outside of the city is more the rule than the exception. Of the department's 873 sworn officers, only about 8 percent — or 72 officers — live in ZIP codes that cover most of Minneapolis, according to a Star Tribune analysis of city records. Not that times have changed all that much: in 1989, about 70 percent of the police force lived elsewhere.
Today, you're more likely to run into a Minneapolis cop after hours and out of uniform in Hudson, Wis., (home to 10 officers) or Elk River (12) than in parts of the North Side, the records show. One officer commutes about 60 miles each way to the city from his or her home in Deronda, Wis.
The fractious debate over whether officers should live in the communities they patrol resurfaced in the wake of a series of high-profile police shootings, including that of Justine Ruszczyk Damond in south Minneapolis last month. One way of bridging the divide between law enforcement and communities of color is to have the two sides live next to each other, say some advocates.
New Minneapolis Police Chief Medaria Arradondo said at a community forum last week that where an officer lives matters less than his or her willingness to serve, and that working to stem racial profiling and recruit more minorities are more important to regaining public trust.
"I will take character over residency every day of the week," Arradondo said. "I don't care if a person lives in Alaska."