Facing off under the shadow of the nation's financial crisis, Rep. Michele Bachmann and DFLer Elwyn Tinklenberg offered different remedies Wednesday in their first debate of the Sixth Congressional District race, with the incumbent deploring an expensive bailout and the challenger arguing that funds are needed to avert a deeper crisis.
Bachmann, a Republican who voted against a $700 billion rescue plan Monday, urged changes in accounting and investment rules and greater federal insurance protection of bank deposits instead of a large bailout.
"This is not the way to do it," she said of the $700 billion bailout. "There's a better way."
But Tinklenberg, who also has been endorsed by the Independence Party (IP), said a bailout of some kind is necessary to restore confidence in the nation's credit system.
"What the financial markets needed most of all Monday was confidence," he said. "Instead, they got uncertainty and chaos."
A third participant Wednesday, Bob Anderson of the IP, said Congress needs to take more time to come up with a rescue plan. The crisis "didn't happen overnight," he said. "We don't need to fix it overnight."
The debate in Stillwater, attended by about 150 people, came hours before Bachmann was expected to return to Washington for a vote on a revised rescue package. The earlier plan failed in the House; Democrats supported it by a 3-2 margin, while Republicans voted against it 2-1 after public opposition mounted against a taxpayer bailout.
The Senate approved a new rescue package Wednesday night that included provisions considered more acceptable to GOP House members who opposed the earlier plan. Those included tax breaks, easing accounting rules and raising FDIC insurance on bank accounts from a maximum $100,000 to $250,000.