Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
It seems as if nearly every kind of tax increase under the Minnesota sun — save for one — has been under consideration at some point during the legislative session that will run out of constitutional gas on May 22.
What's been avoided? It's the venerable state tax on gasoline — the one that's approaching a milestone birthday.
Next year marks a 100th anniversary for Minnesota's per-gallon gas tax, which since 2008 has clocked in at 28.5 cents per gallon. In 1924, voters enthusiastically — well, in big numbers anyway — amended the Minnesota Constitution to require that all gasoline tax proceeds be directed to the trunk highway fund. There, the funds could be spent on roads, bridges, and nothing else.
Were 60% of 1924 voters saying "Let us pay more at the pump, please!"? Not likely. My reading of old newspapers suggests that the gas tax may have been no more popular then than it is today.
What was popular was the idea that a tax related to driving should accrue to the benefit of drivers, not other recipients of state general-fund dollars. In short, the gas tax was to be a user fee. Thanks to those 1924 voters, it still is.
I'll give those Roaring '20s voters credit. As automobile use was becoming ubiquitous, Minnesotans badly wanted safe and reliable roads. But they also apparently recognized that if roads had to compete at the Legislature with education, care for the disabled and the rest of the state budget, roads were not likely to be winners. Politicians tend to put people (who vote) before asphalt.