Paul Freid will soon take delivery of about 40 turkey chicks at his small farm near Lake City, where hogs and chickens already roam.
Freid is "a little nervous" about bird flu, but believes his outdoor birds' more natural diet and healthier immune systems will shield them some from the threat.
"I trust that the way we raise our animals leads to greater health," he said. "Might I have a problem? Sure, but any producer would say that."
So far, nearly all of the 88 farms decimated by the highly lethal H5N2 virus in Minnesota have been confined turkey operations, meaning the birds are raised completely in barns. But whether Freid's and other free range flocks will be at similar risk of bird flu will be tested in the coming weeks as they release the chicks outdoors for the first time this year.
Whatever happens in terms of disease is likely to reignite a debate on whether raising poultry indoors is helping or hurting the birds, as the industry tries to find ways to strengthen biosecurity measures to keep the outbreaks under control.
Freid and his wife, Sara, have raised free-range turkeys for the past seven years at their southeastern Minnesota farm. They do not feed the birds antibiotics, and allow them to dine on fresh grass, bugs and other vegetation, supplemented with vitamins and minerals.
Turkeys and chickens were once commonly raised outdoors, but most chickens consumed in the United States were being raised indoors by the 1950s and confined flocks of egg-laying chickens, turkeys and other livestock have also come to dominate U.S. production, with barns that house tens of thousands of animals.
Veterinary experts say there's no evidence that free-range turkeys or chickens are any less susceptible to infection from the highly contagious bird flu virus than birds that are raised in barns.