In a case closely watched by disability rights advocates, a Mankato woman has won a temporary legal victory in her months-long struggle to regain control of her personal decisions from a court-appointed guardian.
Cindy Hagen, a 49-year-old who became quadriplegic after a childhood car accident, has been at the Mayo Clinic hospital in Austin since last July, even after she was deemed healthy enough to leave, because she has been unable to find enough staff to provide care at her apartment in Mankato.
After several failed attempts to move Hagen to a facility for seniors, a Blue Earth County District Court judge in January placed her under an emergency guardianship — which gave an outside entity control over nearly every aspect of Hagen's life. Hagen and her attorney have insisted that she is capable of making decisions on her own, and that a guardian is not necessary.
Now, after two months of contested proceedings, Hagen has won back her independence — for now.
A Blue Earth County District judge approved an agreement last week that lifts the emergency guardianship, allowing Hagen to transition to a home of her choosing. The agreement comes with a caveat. The guardianship will be reinstated if Hagen does not arrange in-home care and move by May 12.
Although the threat of a guardianship still looms, Hagen expressed relief that she would once again be able to avail herself of freedoms that most people take for granted. For the past few months, Hagen said she has lived in fear that a guardian would move her to a nursing home or other site far removed from her apartment and community of friends in Mankato, where she led an active life before she was hospitalized last summer for an infection.
"I finally have my freedom back," Hagen said from her hospital room. "But it's really scary to think that they could strip away my right to make my own decisions and send me wherever they want. ... What kind of life is that?"
Hagen's struggle to win back her autonomy galvanized many in the disability rights community, who have long argued that Minnesota's system for appointing guardians is heavy-handed and overused. For decades, guardians have been granted broad authority over the housing, medical care and even the personal relationships of people they are assigned to protect. Judges often grant this authority based on limited information and assumptions that people with disabilities are incapable of making major life decisions, say attorneys and disability advocates.