
MLB owners approved a proposal Tuesday for an 80-plus game season that starts sometime in early July.
The level of certainty involved with this plan is somewhere near zero. Where exactly will they play, who will everyone play, how exactly will they keep everyone safe and how legitimate is a half-season are all valid questions without firm answers.
And the biggest truth of all: They can set dates and plan all they want, but everything involved with coronavirus is a moving target.
The uncertainty about the future, however, is sometimes mitigated by the fixed nature of the past.
As an exercise in both amusement and information, let's take a look back at 2019 (and some other seasons as well) to see how things might have looked for the Twins had the regular season consisted of only the first 80 games.
This isn't a perfect science since teams will probably play with more urgency with roughly half the normal number of games on the schedule. And it should be noted that 80 games is probably representative enough of teams' strengths since it's very similar to the length of an NBA and NHL season (82 games) and still five times as long as an NFL season.
*After 80 games in 2019, the Twins were 52-28 — eight games clear of Cleveland in the American League Central. They would have been the runaway division winners, minus the drama that evolved as the summer went on.
They would have tied the Yankees — also 52-28 after 80 games — for the best record in the majors. The Yankees would have been the No. 1 seed based on a 2-1 head-to-head edge over the Twins, and Minnesota would have had home field advantage while facing Houston in the ALDS in the first round. Chances are folks around here would be even more mad about the Astros cheating if that series had happened and the Twins had lost. Or maybe they'd just be happy not to play the Yankees.