Historic preservation is typically associated with buildings that have been standing for a century or longer. But should the same protections extend to 50-year-old buildings that were erected during an era of suburban flight and urban renewal?
It's a hot topic these days in historic preservation circles. Turning 50 makes it easier to list buildings on the National Register of Historic Places, even if the angular designs and exposed concrete of the 1950s and '60s don't inspire the same nostalgia as their 19th-century counterparts.
Not all buildings from the era are significant, but determining which ones qualify requires research that today remains sparse. A listing itself does not protect a building in most cases, but cities like Minneapolis apply extra scrutiny to properties on the register if the owner wants to demolish them.
"Preservation is a difficult argument to make to begin with," said Todd Grover, who heads the local chapter of Docomomo, a group dedicated to documenting and conserving "modern movement" architecture. "And when you add this modernism on top of that it makes it even more difficult. That's why there needs to be more information, more understanding and more awareness."
The latest front in this debate locally is in Minneapolis' Dinkytown district, where the 1963 Ralph Rapson-designed Southeast library is under threat. Hennepin County is assessing what to do with the building, whose small size, blind spots and rigid design make it difficult to operate as a modern library.
Some are eyeing demolition, but that is likely to draw fierce opposition from preservationists like Grover, whose group is bringing its annual national symposium to the Twin Cities this year.
"This is a prime property that unfortunately is an unbelievable example of Ralph's work," Grover said of Rapson, Minnesota's most prominent Modern architect and a longtime head of the University of Minnesota's architecture school.
Rapson designed the first Guthrie Theater, enveloped in distinctive wooden frames, also in 1963. A Save the Guthrie movement coalesced in the early 2000s to save the building because of its architectural and cultural significance, but the City Council ultimately overturned the city's heritage preservation commission and allowed demolition to proceed in 2006.