A few months ago, I began to feel a fatigue that would linger and tumble into the rest of my day. There is a baseline level of exhaustion that comes with kids and work and friends and life. And anything after age 40 seems more arduous, honestly.
But this fatigue had spilled into my other obligations and my lengthy task lists had seemed impossible to complete by the end of the day. While I always rise early enough to do what's necessary to start my day, those pre-sunrise awakenings were never my preference.
I am a bona fide night owl.
Some days, I'd get up at 5:30 a.m. or earlier. Other days, I'd beat the kids' alarm by a few minutes. On weekends, I just tried to recoup any rest that I'd lost during the week, an often unsuccessful task with work and family responsibilities.
Because of my work in the sports world, however, I'm an expert at getting to the airport by 4:30 a.m. and catching a 5:45 a.m. flight. But again, I have to do that. I would never get up early simply because I believed it offered a real benefit.
Plus, I resented the morning people. You know the type. Their early mornings are a whole persona. By the time the rest of us hit snooze, they've already gone to the gym, read their favorite books and finished a few paintings.
There are conflicting studies on the value of rising early and I also don't adhere to any concept that says one philosophy works for everyone. But a book from the early 1900s made me consider the possibility that a better morning might lead to a more fruitful day for me.
"The obvious thing to do is to circumvent your ardor for your ordinary day's work by a ruse," said Arnold Bennett in "How to Live on 24 Hours a Day," published in 1910.