The two presidential candidates said they had nearly $300 million in the bank for the final leg of the campaign, raising a simple question: What in the world are they going to do with all that money?
How to spend $300 million in the final stretch?
Unlike past campaigns, both candidates have money to burn in the final days -- easily $16 million a day for each.
By DAN EGGEN
November 1, 2012 at 1:37AM
The answer, of course, is that they are going to spend it -- at a rate never seen before in the annals of American politics.
In previous contests, candidates such as Democrat John Kerry or Republican Bob Dole often began pulling back from broad swaths of the country near the end of the race to focus their dwindling resources on the most contested states. Most candidates since the 1970s also have been constrained by voluntary public financing limits that kept a lid on how much money they had available.
President Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney, by contrast, have money to burn. The Romney campaign and the Republican National Committee had a combined reserve of $169 million cash on hand as of Oct. 17, according to the last full disclosure report before the Nov. 6 election. The Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee together had $125 million.
That money would allow the two campaigns to spend about $16 million a day through the election, and that doesn't count the millions more that each side has continued to raise since the mid-October tally.
The totals also don't include the super PACs and nonprofit groups spending big on behalf of the two candidates, particularly Romney. Restore Our Future, a pro-Romney super PAC, spent about $31 million a week on ads in early October and has booked another $40 million in ads through Election Day.
Some of the money on the campaign side will be used for get-out-the-vote efforts, not to mention costs for a blizzard of candidate travel, rallies and other last-ditch events.
But the bulk during the final stretch goes to the most expensive line item in any campaign's budget: broadcast advertising. Even after months of saturation-level advertising in Ohio, Virginia, Florida and other key states, both sides further escalated their spending in the hope of persuading undecided independents or moving more of their avid supporters to the polls.
"Most of it will go to TV," Republican strategist Mark McKinnon said. "And most of it will be wasted."
The campaigns and outside groups, who already aired more than $50 million per week in ads in early October, have increased expenditures in the final days. The Republicans have outpaced the Democrats in ad spending for weeks, but studies show Obama has been able to keep pace by taking advantage of discounts and choosing cheaper time slots.
Political strategists say campaigns and their surrogates strive to spend every dime by Election Day in the hope that something will give them an edge. The Obama campaign, which has raised a bit more than $1 billion with the DNC, even took out a $15 million credit line this fall, just in case it needs a little extra. "We're not taking anything for granted," Obama adviser David Axelrod said.
about the writer
DAN EGGEN
While the focus was on Vice President Kamala Harris in their first media interview of the presidential campaign, Walz was asked if voters could take him at his word.
