Gov. Mark Dayton sought to unify Minnesotans around solving the state's emerging water challenges at a St. Paul summit Saturday that brought together hundreds of activists, farmers, lobbyists, legislators and regulators.
But even as those present spoke of hope and resolve, the costs and conflicts surrounding water issues were immediately evident, as a group of demonstrators interrupted Dayton's opening remarks to protest the construction of oil pipelines they said would threaten water quality and cultural touchstones like wild rice farming in tribal lands.
After Dayton promised to meet with the protesters, they left the stage, and he continued, not by proposing laws or regulations, but by sounding more like a pastor of water.
"What we really need is to establish an ethic of clean water practices," he said. "I urge you, and I ask you, to spend today establishing our ethic: that clean water practices are every Minnesotan's responsibility. That anything less is unacceptable. And that it's achievable if all of us do our part."
Dayton made water quality a top priority last year after seeing a report from the state's Pollution Control Agency that showed half the lakes and streams in southern Minnesota are not safe for fishing or swimming. A separate report released last week said nearly two-thirds of test wells in central Minnesota are contaminated with excessive levels of nitrates, a common fertilizer.
Last year, the DFL governor engaged in a protracted negotiation with legislators and farm groups over a water quality measure that sought to require buffers around waterways to protect them from pesticide and fertilizer pollution, a measure that is still controversial among farmers.
The state's $19 billion farm economy continues to be a key fault line in water debates.
"I was alarmed when the governor prefaced his remarks by saying we weren't going to point any fingers today, and then he proceeded to spend all his speech pointing all the fingers at agriculture," said Rep. Paul Torkelson. The Hanska Republican is chairman of the bonding committee that will hear Dayton's proposal to spend $220 million on water treatment projects, much of it in outstate communities to remove agricultural contaminants from drinking water.