Just last year, the Minneapolis Police Department braced for the expected crowds of people eager to see what their officers were recording with their new body cameras.
So far, the newest movies in Minneapolis have been a box-office flop.
Since the city began outfitting each patrol officer with a camera last summer, the police Records Information Unit received only 25 requests for information that included body camera video, according to department data.
Five were from investigators and others within government; seven came from lawyers; three were from news media.
Only 10 individuals asked to see the video of encounters they or acquaintances had with officers.
These requests make up a tiny fraction of the overall workload for the records unit, which handles 2,000 to 3,000 requests for accident and crime reports every week.
Last year, the city hired two additional staff members to review and process body camera video, as part of the $4 million rollout that equipped more than 550 officers with the technology. The rapid adoption of body cameras by front-line officers is intended in part to shore up public confidence in police by improving transparency and accountability.
While the video is shared internally as part of investigations and prosecutions, the few outside requests for the data reveal that it is mainly about private disputes, such as custody battles and traffic accidents, rather than as a check on police misconduct.