President Donald Trump's administration has dug in on its contention that the government should not have to repatriate Kilmar Abrego Garcia, despite U.S. Supreme Court and lower court rulings that he was wrongly deported and should be returned to the United States.
U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis has required daily status updates on what the Trump administration is doing to return Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old Salvadoran who had been living in Maryland and is married to a U.S. citizen.
For weeks, officials have alternated between admitting Abrego Garcia was deported in error and arguing that the U.S. has no more power in the matter because he's now in El Salvador.
Here is a look at what judges, federal officials and Trump lieutenants have said about Abrego Garcia's case.
A claim of MS-13 gang activity
SPRING 2019: During Trump's first administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement detains Abrego Garcia and, according to court records, asserts that an informant has identified him as ''a verified gang member.'' An immigration judge denies Abrego Garcia bond, saying he is ''confirmed to be a ranking member of the MS-13 gang by a proven and reliable source.''
The official Notice to Appear in immigration court, however, focuses only on the undisputed fact that Abrego Garcia previously crossed the U.S. border without legal status — he ''was not then admitted or paroled after inspection by an immigration officer,'' the notice says. Abrego Garcia and his attorneys deny any gang affiliation; he has never been charged with a related crime.
FALL 2019: Another immigration judge grants Abrego Garcia protection from removal to El Salvador, affirming his contention that he would be endangered by local gangs there. But the judge denies him blanket asylum, noting that ''withholding from removal, in contrast to asylum, confers only the right not to be deported to a particular country rather than the right to remain in the U.S.'' This point will become key to the Trump administration's current arguments.