2024 should be a good year for affordable housing, and a challenging one for housing affordability, in Minnesota.
I'm not just playing with words. I'm talking about two different things that people often think are the same.
Affordable housing is a common expression, and most people think it means housing that's affordable — to them.
In the world of real estate, finance, advocacy and government, however, the term "affordable housing" has a technical meaning. It describes housing for low- and moderate-income families, usually those making 60% or less of a region's median income.
When political or business leaders speak (or journalists write) about housing, it's sometimes difficult to tell whether they're talking about housing affordability in broad terms or about the pursuit of affordable housing more narrowly.
In that confusion, it's easy to lose track of the bigger goal: We need more homes of any kind.
For about two decades in the Twin Cities, there was not enough home construction to preserve the region's reputation for housing affordability broadly — nor to meet demand for homes that would be affordable to lower-income residents.
The Itasca Group, Metropolitan Council and others at the start of this decade set targets in the Twin Cities region — 18,000 new housing units overall annually and about 2,100 units of affordable housing. The Minneapolis Fed has an online scoreboard to track progress.