THE HAGUE, Netherlands — The stunning announcement that the International Criminal Court is considering issuing an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes and crimes against humanity has ignited a fierce debate about the court's future as an independent arbiter.
The request by Prosecutor Karim Khan against the leader of a close U.S. ally also comes as the United Nations' highest court, the International Court of Justice, is investigating whether Israel has committed genocide during its seven-month war against Hamas in Gaza.
Although human rights activists generally welcomed Khan's move on Monday, which also included requests to arrest Israel's defense minister and three Hamas leaders, Netanyahu told ABC News that Khan's decision turned the ICC into a ''pariah institution.''
In Washington, where Senate Republicans have threatened sanctions against ICC staff, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the Hague-based court doesn't have jurisdiction and that it was ''extremely wrongheaded'' for the prosecutor to equate the Israeli officials with the Hamas leaders he's seeking to indict.
Blinken said Tuesday that the Biden administration would work with Congress to come up with an appropriate response.
Khan has warned that attempts to interfere with the ICC's work would be an offense under its founding treaty, the Rome Statute. However, the warning may not carry much weight, as world powers including the U.S., Israel, China and Russia, aren't members of the court and don't recognize its jurisdiction
European countries generally support the court, with France and Belgium underscoring their backing after Monday's announcement.
''France supports the International Criminal Court, its independence, and the fight against impunity in all situations,'' the country's foreign ministry said in a statement late Monday, around the same time Belgium's foreign minister expressed support for the tribunal.