Did an iPad fixation cost Inver Grove Heights schools a chance at money to equip classrooms for 21st century learning?
Within hours of a levy defeat last month, the buzz on Facebook was about a disconnect between district needs, such as an upgraded computer network and a new telephone system, and the perception that school leaders wanted to buy every child an iPad.
Apple's popular tablet computer, for a lot of people, "means gaming device or some sort of plaything," said Liz Niemioja, a mother of two young children in Inver Grove Heights. "They don't know how it can really assist in learning, and they don't know how it can save a lot of money," she said.
Leaders in the 3,794-student district had proposed raising $700,000 per year for 10 years to meet technology needs. A homeowner with a $200,000 house would have paid about $60 per year in additional taxes.
Voters rejected the measure, 1,614 to 845, in a March 27 special referendum. Voters had rejected the measure once before, 2,025 to 1,646, last November.
The district's informational campaign included a video with testimonials from teachers about the advantages of innovative teaching tools. Interspersed among the scenes with teachers were scenes of children using iPads in the classroom.
In the Facebook comment stream, Niemioja was among those who agreed that the district should have done a better job of explaining its needs.
"Put it on the ballot AGAIN and simplify it to the nuts and bolts -- and get people off this iPad obsession," she wrote. "The iPad example confused people until it became the only focus."