Does it matter whether you listen to a book or read the text with your own eyes?
Is listening cheating?
Absolutely! Certainly not! Who cares?
That sums up reader responses to the questions posed in a recent Bookmark. Many thanks to all who shared their views.
"You asked for an opinion on audiobooks and that is the only way I find time to read, so yes, in my mind they are the only way to go!" said Karin Trosine.
Micah Haber said no. "Taking a book in auditorially is no longer a book; it is instead listening to a script on the radio, with possible detrimental effects when taken in public. As for my rule of when to listen to audiobooks: not even once."
For Pam Shubat, audiobooks changed reading for the better. "I am guilty of speed reading through text, skipping over descriptions of scenes, emotions, environment or whatever else is slowing down my race to take in the plot. When I switched to audio in order to avoid neck and back strain from sitting with a book, a whole new appreciation of books opened up. I was no longer able to scan a page to take in the plot line. Instead, I listened to stories unfold as the author intended."
An audiobook user since 1999, Mark Luther said, "I have generally found that a good book listened to will be a good book read. However, not all good written books are also audio (try listening to 'Lincoln in the Bardo' — impossible to follow). I have also found that listening to nonfiction is difficult while driving a car, but a fiction book is easier to follow while driving.