Sometimes food is not really good at being food but we still love it. Why, for Pete's sake?
Many a culture, religion, ethnic group, and extended family has some traditional thingy on its holiday menu that takes a day-and-a-half and six people to prepare, looks odd, smells disgusting, tastes terrible, and is sensibly avoided by the most logical people at the table — the 5-year-olds.
We do not require these foods for nutrition or enjoy these foods as edible stuffs, but by golly, we keep reproducing them, and forcing beloved family members to eat them.
Take, for example, the brick of angry, dried fruit Brits call fruitcake, Germans call stollen, and Italians named panettone. Legend has it that fruitcake originated as a Roman army energy bar, lending its shelf-life to long campaigns. How, precisely, the stuff lasted in an ancient Italian backpack is anyone's guess, but great-aunts have long recognized fruitcake's ability to travel through the mail without arriving the worse for wear.
Then there are pig's feet and hog jowls of some Southern African-American traditions, meant to attract prosperity in the new year. At a friend's New Year's Eve celebration a few Januarys ago, I was seated next to a marvelous 83-year-old professor, who leaned over and sagely advised: "Concentrate on the cornbread."
My host revealed that the pig's ears had been cooking for three days, requiring periodic airing out of the kitchen, and that before putting them on to boil, she had tweezed away errant hairs.
Any recipe that begins with tweezing the protein source requires more fortitude to prepare than I possess.
Lutefisk is a "food" that my family has made, year after year. Minnesotans need no explanation of the terrors of it, as we suffer them at annual church basement dinners so that we can skip purgatory and get straight into heaven. If you married into Minnesota, I'll just say this: Lutefisk smells like wet feet left in rubber boots, and requires the cook to wear a clothespin on her nose and carry a long-handled spoon.