When former President Bill Clinton appointed Donovan Frank to the federal bench 15 years ago, it was widely assumed that he would be a different kind of jurist — someone more connected with the real-world concerns of ordinary people than the Ivy League alums who populate the nation's highest courts.
Frank is the son of a small-town shopkeeper, a recovering alcoholic who spoke publicly about his early battles with addiction, and a tireless advocate for people with disabilities. To this day, his computer screen saver flashes a quote often attributed to Gandhi: "Be the change you wish to see in the world."
But the judge whom many pegged as a bleeding-heart liberal when the late Sen. Paul Wellstone nominated him for the federal bench has surprised legal observers with his no-nonsense application of the law and strict adherence to precedent. He has distinguished himself by meting out tough prison sentences for criminals and for issuing unusually harsh rebukes of anyone who dares violate court orders.
Now, this former prosecutor — who tried and won a landmark case against a child molester — is about to determine the fates of hundreds of civilly committed rapists, pedophiles and other violent sex offenders across Minnesota, in a case being closely watched by criminal justice advocates nationwide.
A class consisting of hundreds of sex offenders has accused the state of Minnesota of violating their constitutional rights by locking them away indefinitely at high-security treatment centers in Moose Lake and St. Peter after they have already served their prison sentences. Some of the 700 detained offenders have come to refer to the centers as "Minnesota's Guantanamo" because almost no one is ever released.
Frank, who declined to discuss the case, has promised to rule on the constitutionality of the program by Feb. 16.
In hearings, the judge has been openly skeptical of Minnesota's civil commitment process, and some lawmakers are worried that he may take a radical step and order the shutdown of the 19-year-old Minnesota Sex Offender Program, or MSOP, prompting the sudden release of hundreds of convicted rapists and child molesters.
But those familiar with Frank's history of apolitical judicial restraint, and his tough-but-fair approach to dealing with criminals, suggest he may stop short of the radical revamping of the MSOP sought by some civil liberties advocates. Frank has been tougher on convicted criminals than his colleagues on the federal bench during the past five years as a federal judge, according to court data.