Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
In early 1977, as Jimmy Carter began his presidency, Minnesota decriminalized small-amount cannabis possession. These two events connected. Marijuana, the term the criminal code selected for cannabis, caught on in the 1960s, becoming a powerful symbol of social angst. It was iconic of a troubled and divided America. For 24 years, our nonprofit quietly managed Minnesota’s decriminalization program for the Minnesota Supreme Court.
With decriminalization, the typically young offender would attend classes on drug abuse. If they weren’t rearrested (as none of the 7,000 were), they avoided possible incarceration and a destructive criminal record. It also saved local government serious money. The program likely wouldn’t have survived without Carter White House intervention.
By 1976, cannabis was common among a substantial minority of young Minnesotans. The cannabis leaf emblem was prominent in Vietnam antiwar and some civil-rights demonstrations. Selective enforcement at the time targeted perceived “undesirables.” A young Black man driving through the suburbs was likely to get stopped and searched, as was any young person with an attitude. It fed divisive civics with minorities disproportionately charged with cannabis possession.
The Minnesota education alternative was quickly adopted by nearly all Minnesota prosecutors and state district courts. It also was attacked. One legislator labeled the program a “pro-hippy surrender of values.” The program was in jeopardy when the Carter White House stepped in.
I first used cannabis as a soldier in Vietnam in 1969, at the recommendation of a Special Forces medic following an especially traumatic combat experience. I was surprised when it quickly relaxed me, as it did many other combatants. I also saw it misused. I witnessed a stoned soldier kill a fellow American. Like alcohol, cannabis can comfort as well as harm users. Acknowledging its capacity for value as well as misuse is important.
After service, I completed graduate work in epidemiology and established a nonprofit company on public-health policy. Among other projects, we established and managed the statewide drug education alternative for the courts. The program was attacked by politicians, some law enforcement and especially outraged, ad-hoc anti-drug groups. Recriminalizing small amount possession was probable.