The Hennepin County district judge overseeing the Minneapolis police ballot question dispute was just 35 when Gov. Tim Pawlenty, for whom her husband was a top trusted aide, appointed her to the bench in 2010.
Judge Jamie Anderson's husband, Paul, was the GOP governor's deputy chief of staff when she was appointed only a decade after receiving her law degree in 2000 from Case Western Reserve University School of Law in Cleveland.
Now Anderson is handling one of the most significant cases in the state, with implications for public safety not just in Minnesota but across the United States — the highest-profile case of her judicial career.
The judge is in charge of resolving a host of legal issues about the ballot question that may determine the future of policing in Minneapolis. In the next few days, she will shape the wording of what, if anything, appears on the city's November ballot regarding the staffing of the Police Department. The next hearing is set for Monday morning.
When she was put on the bench by Pawlenty, Anderson was a somewhat atypical appointee because of her age, her limited courtroom experience and her close personal ties to the governor.
In selecting her, Pawlenty bypassed the usual judicial selection process, and the news release about her appointment made no mention of her political connection to him.
But once on the bench, Anderson quickly established herself as a collaborative and industrious judge who asked good questions, looked for greater understanding and volunteered whenever there was work to be done.
"When she got here, people didn't really know her, but man, she built a good reputation for herself," Chief District Judge Toddrick Barnette said Friday. "She's respectful to people, but she doesn't take any nonsense. You've got to be prepared when you're in front of her."