Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
It would be troubling enough if the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension was not able to provide public records to a family of a victim of a police shooting. But to not provide records on five police shootings is more than concerning.
The five families of victims have filed a lawsuit against the BCA claiming it has violated the state's Data Practices Act. The case seems straightforward in favor of the plaintiffs if the investigations are indeed "inactive" or complete. State law requires release of the information in those cases.
But the BCA told the Mankato Free Press that it will release the information to the families as soon as possible after it has reviewed "voluminous" reports, body cam, dashcam and surveillance footage and images because by law it must remove information not considered public data.
A BCA spokesperson wrote in an email to the Free Press: "The BCA is committed to providing information to families and the public as quickly as possible, while ensuring the protection of information that we cannot release under Minnesota law."
The cases have been closed and no charges were brought against any police officer, but the fact of closure, according to Minnesota law, requires police agencies to release records of the investigation to the public with few exceptions. Plaintiffs argued the BCA is in violation of the Data Practices Act because they were not supplied information on their cases in 10 days after requesting the information.
All cases have been closed for months, and one family has been waiting three years for their report. That's significant in that the statute of limitations for a wrongful death case in Minnesota is three years.