Conservation projects in the metro area are poised to receive more Lessard-Sams grant money than ever before under this year's Outdoor Heritage Fund bill at the Legislature.
As crafted by a nonpartisan committee of eight citizens and four lawmakers, recommendations in the bill steer 18% of the overall funding package toward natural resource protection and enhancement projects in the Twin Cities. Also unprecedented is the sheer magnitude of the Legacy Amendment fund. Now at $159 million, the overall pot of dedicated sales tax receipts is 24% greater than the previous high of $128 million approved last year.
"Minnesota has an outstanding record of doing everything it can to help preserve our outdoor heritage,'' Rep. Rob Ecklund, D-International Falls, said earlier this month as he championed the Lessard-Sams bill in a key House committee. "This is a good bill for protecting and preserving our environment.''
In the city of Rogers, approval of the bill would deliver $1 million for the purchase and preservation of Stieg Woods, a rare 20-acre tract of old-growth, hardwood forest that would otherwise be lost to development. In St. Paul, portions of Phalen Creek would be "daylighted'' by the excavation of old, underground channels. Various other projects would permanently expand or enhance wildlife corridors along the Mississippi, St. Croix and Minnesota rivers. In all, Twin Cities projects could receive upward of $27 million.
To close observers of the annual Lessard-Sams project list, the split of money is noteworthy because of past tug-of-wars between urban interests and the dominant outdoors constituencies of outstate Minnesota. The dedicated fund derives most of its cash from the Twin Cities economy based on a fractional sales tax approved by voters in 2008. But most high priorities for game, fish and wildlife habitats rest Up North, in the prairie regions, transition areas and Minnesota's southeastern Driftless Area.
Scott Rall, a former member of the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council, said urban-rural tensions over the bill have softened substantially since the first Lessard-Sams appropriation was approved by the Legislature in 2009. Back then, metro area legislators had to be reminded that politics of geography had nothing to do with where the dollars would be spent.
"I don't perceive the metro versus outstate thing to be an ongoing debate, but it certainly will be an undercurrent in that bill forever,'' said Rall, who worked on the council for six years.
He said the ultimate guideline for him in evaluating applications was whether the proposed project would result in greater populations of game, fish and wildlife.