Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Leo recited the first poem. He was sipping whiskey, I was nursing a beer, and spirits seem a potion more conducive to declaiming verse. He was 75 years old that autumn evening; I was 34. I'd known him all my life as the father of my oldest friend and something of a surrogate dad to me.
The rest of the crew — a gathering of family and friends — had settled on a theater excursion, but Leo demurred and I opted to keep him company. I forget what thread of our conversation launched that poem, but I immediately responded with another and we were off, tag-teaming with verse — unselfconscious, delighted and chuckling at our audacity. "Poetry," wrote Carl Sandburg, "is an echo asking a shadow to dance." We did that. The affection and joy suffusing the room was palpable, like the radiant glow of a hearth.
Leo had memorized his poems in school during the 1920s, when such a discipline was valued and routine. I'd mastered mine during solitary night shifts at a sewage treatment plant. It was a means to stay sharp, to kill a long shift. I worked aloud, so the stanzas of William Butler Yeats resounded from the dripping dome and dark ripples of the primary clarifiers.
Many, if not most people have a predilection for poetry stretching back to nursery rhymes and Dr. Seuss, but during a freshman year at what was then the College of St. Thomas I was especially fortunate to take an introductory poetry course delivered by a man who was clearly inspired by the language and vibe of verse. He was a middle-aged Catholic priest, and I was wary at first, having known some fierce, humorless clerics. But besides his love for the genre, he won me over the morning he had the temerity to assure the skeptical Vietnam combat veteran in the front row that the poetry of Englishman Wilfred Owen, a recipient of the Military Cross who was killed in World War I, would provide the veteran insights into warfare. By the man's own admission, it did.
As Rita Dove wrote, "Poetry is language at its most distilled and most powerful."
Speaking of power, the nearly invincible Mongol armies of the 13th century that swept all before them from Hungary to the Korean Peninsula, were victorious in no small part because of poetry. Their superb military organization was sustained and lubricated by orders constructed in verse. In a biography of Genghis Khan, Jack Weatherford wrote: "Mongols often used specific poetic forms of alliteration and meter, similar to a limerick in English but much more serious in tone, to convey messages as exactly as possible in a way that could be easily memorized not only by the messenger but also by everyone who heard it."