VIKINGS WANT A STADIUM
If we build one, then we should own them
There is a solution to the Vikings' need for a new stadium and the Legislature and governor's desire to focus on funding basic needs in an economic downturn (Star Tribune, Feb. 12) but it will mean taking on the NFL's rules against community ownership.
What is needed is a statewide campaign to sell shares in a new corporation set up exclusively to build a stadium. The Vikings are called the Minnesota Vikings for a reason, and there is no justifiable reason to not sell shares in a new stadium (i.e., lifetime season tickets) across the whole state. Vikings fans in Morris, Duluth, Rochester, International Falls and Rushford deserve just as much of an opportunity to be part of the solution to keep the team in the state as do fans in the metro area.
The only entity that does not win in such a scenario is the NFL, and it is past time to take that organization to court, challenge its antitrust exemption and override its ability to prevent communities from owning or operating NFL franchises, and/or their stadiums.
ERICK HIGHUM, FRIDLEY
•••
The Vikings can't be serious about having taxpayers fund a new stadium for them, can they? Not in these tough economic times -- or ever! In plain terms, it's extortion. Even with threats of moving the team to Los Angeles, it does nothing to inspire me, as a taxpayer, to want to pay for a new stadium for a bunch of millionaires.
I don't care how much the apparent "know-it-all" NFL says there needs to be a new stadium here. The Dome was good enough for them only two-plus decades ago. Did it become obsolete? Seems we survive OK with countless public schools, libraries, courthouses, etc., that are much older.
The name "Los Angeles Vikings" does have a nice ring to it.