Fifty years after its founding, the Metropolitan Council was credited with keeping sewage out of rivers and planning for the region's growth but also faulted for losing the trust of some suburban cities and counties.
Former leaders of the Twin Cities' unique regional government offered candid views Thursday on the perennial controversies surrounding the agency, which was founded in 1967 and oversees wastewater, transit and land use planning for the seven-county metro area.
The bipartisan panel of former Met Council chairs convened during an anniversary celebration at the University of Minnesota's McNamara Alumni Center. Republican lawmakers in particular have criticized what they feel is the council's expanding scope and lack of accountability to local governments, as its members are appointed by the governor, not elected. The council's structure has been controversial since its inception.
Former Chairman Curt Johnson, who was appointed by then-Gov. Arne Carlson, said the council must give local governments a larger role in regional governance.
"They feel like they're second-class citizens in making regional decisions," Johnson said. "And the noise is getting louder, the pressure is getting more intense. I think it is absolutely inevitable there will be a governance change."
Johnson expressed concerns about local elected officials serving double duty as Met Council members, however. He added that the controversy that surrounds the council is better than irrelevance.
"I think it's getting more media attention because it is engaged in things that does divide people, that does stir them up," Johnson said. "And that's probably a good thing. The worst thing that could happen to the council is not being noticed at all."
Reflecting some of those concerns, moderator Brian McDaniel read a question from Republican Rep. Jim Nash, R-Waconia.