Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman will remain connected to the prosecution of four former Minneapolis police officers charged in connection with the killing of George Floyd, a judge ruled Friday.
Without hearing further arguments from either side, Hennepin County District Judge Peter Cahill swiftly dismissed a motion filed just a day earlier by the attorney for J. Alexander Kueng. Kueng's attorney, Thomas C. Plunkett, argued Freeman's prior public statements and his close ties to law enforcement created an unfair conflict of interest in the case.
Yet in a one-page ruling filed Friday, Cahill found that Plunkett failed to establish that a conflict of interest exists with Freeman's involvement. Plunkett also did not "provide legal authority for the removal of a prosecutor … even if the allegations of improper conduct are true," Cahill wrote.
Plunkett declined to comment on Cahill's decision on Friday.
Freeman has been silent publicly on the case since Attorney General Keith Ellison formally took over the prosecution on May 31. But Plunkett argued this week that Freeman's past statements amounted to a public pronouncement of guilt against his client — citing Freeman calling Floyd's death "senseless" and expressing sympathy for Floyd's family.
"Mr. Freeman's comments leave no doubt that justice is not his objective in the Kueng prosecution," Plunkett wrote. "Mr. Freeman has fomented public anger and now seeks to taint that anger with hatred through the prosecution of Mr. Kueng."
Kueng is awaiting trial on charges of aiding and abetting second-degree murder and manslaughter alongside former officers Thomas Lane and Tou Thao. Fellow fired officer Derek Chauvin has meanwhile been charged with second-degree murder and manslaughter and third-degree murder for Floyd's May 25 death in south Minneapolis.
Plunkett also alleged that Freeman's office violated legal ethical standards by leaking to the news media that Chauvin had been negotiating a plea bargain that fell apart early in the case. He called the leak "particularly egregious and patently unethical."