Minneapolis elections on Nov. 2 might seem a long time off, but important decisions are being made right now that will influence the outcome. This year's elections will include not only voting for the mayor, City Council, Park and Recreation Board and Board of Estimate and Taxation, but also city charter amendments that will determine the future of our city for decades to come.
The City Council and mayor must agree on ballot language for these critical charter amendments by Aug. 20 so that the ballots can be available for the start of early voting on Sept. 17. Minneapolis residents should closely watch the City Council deliberations over the next month, because ballot language could impact the outcome of the election.
Two charter amendments will be on the fall election ballot. Both come to the voters through legitimate routes.
One amendment was unanimously approved by the Charter Commission to strengthen our city's governance by defining the roles of the mayor as the chief executive and the council as the legislative body ensuring constituent services, forming a balanced city government similar to the state and federal governments.
The second amendment, presented by the requisite number of certified voters as the Yes4 petition, would establish a Department of Public Safety, remove the Police Department from the charter and mayoral oversight, and include licensed peace officers only if necessary.
As is standard practice, the city attorney has drafted ballot language with explanatory notes that are accurate, clear and fair in presenting the substance of both charter amendments to voters. When the City Council started to consider the city attorney's draft ballot language at its Policy and Government Oversight Committee meetings in June, the deliberations were not reassuring.
At the June 16 meeting, rather than discuss the draft ballot language, several council members debated the merits of the Charter Commission's proposed amendment to strengthen city governance.
At the June 30 meeting, in discussing the Yes4 petition amendment, one council member stated that the city attorney's office should negotiate with the lawyer representing the Yes4Mpls advocates to tailor ballot language according to their wishes.