“While deliberation and disagreement are natural aspects of our work, adherence to our mutually agreed-upon standards is non-negotiable,” they wrote. “Should you find yourself unable to meet these expectations, we expect you to connect with your colleagues outside of formal meetings to resolve those differences amicably. Behavior that fosters a hostile work environment, violates our rules, or disrupts our City’s democratic processes will not be tolerated.”
Reached by phone, Payne told me that’s he’s not naive to the fact there are some “major personalities” in his line of work. But he said the council members all share a responsibility to uphold the values of the institution. If residents see their leaders acting poorly, that undermines public trust in the system. He urged me to look at how the erosion of that trust can threaten our democracy and put public servants, from election judges to county clerks, in danger, and even lead to a violent insurrection against our Capitol.
“As elected people, we need to model the type of behavior that we want to see in society,” he said. “There’s a saying that all politics are local. We’re moving into an era where all politics are national.”
And it’s not just politics. People in general seem meaner today in youth sports, on airplanes and at school board meetings, so it’s not surprising that our culture has shaped the behaviors we observe in government. Still, elected leaders ought to hold themselves to a higher standard of decency and advocate for a democracy that works, especially as most of us steel ourselves for the vitriol building up to the presidential election.
Payne told me he’s working with the city clerk to develop training for the City Council on how to conduct themselves; he hopes to roll it out within the next few months. When he sent the memo about decorum weeks ago, he was hoping it would spark conversation among his colleagues.
“But it’s mostly been fairly quiet,” he said.