The idea of a “new normal” became a post-pandemic cliche, but the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis thinks there might be economic proof of its truth.
After 11 consecutive interest rate hikes from March 2022 to July 2023, policymakers have kept rates at 5.25% to 5.5%, including upholding that rate at a meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) earlier this month.
All of this is in pursuit of 2% inflation, a goal that seemed in sight after a rapid decline at the end of last year. And yet inflation has stagnated, with the latest personal consumption expenditures price index, the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, at 2.7%.
That has made Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari question if perhaps the ideal natural rate — or the neutral rate of interest theorized to keep job growth strong and inflation stable — has grown a percent since the pandemic to about 3%. As a result, the Fed might need to hold off on interest rate cuts that once seemed likely, Kashkari said Tuesday during a session at the global conference of nonpartisan think tank the Milken Institute.
High inflation typically signals the need for interest rate increases to tame it. A floundering economy, meanwhile, suggests interest rate cuts to stoke activity. The fact inflation has remained high but the economy is still chugging along, including a historically low unemployment rate and increase in residential investment compared to last year, presents a conundrum.
“Right now, it looks like the economy is in a very good place,” Kashkari said during a Tuesday interview with New York Times reporter Jeanna Smialek. “Economic momentum is maintaining. There’s a lot of resilience. It seems like things are kind of at a steady state. So if I had to pick a scenario today, it seems like we are going to kind of go sideways for a while. And under that scenario, that would lead me as a policymaker to say we ought to just sit with interest rates for longer than expected.”
Kashkari, who was a voting member of the FOMC last year, said in March he thought the Fed might need to cut rates twice this year, but now his stance has wavered.
“It’s possible I would stay at two. It’s possible I would go to one or even zero,” he said of potential cuts. “We need to look at the constellation of data.”