Pujan Gandhi, the Minneapolis Institute of Art's new curator of South and Southeast Asian art, started work in September but didn't truly become a Minnesotan until March, when he slipped on the ice and broke his ankle.
Luckily, not much can stop this ambitious young curator. Now he's riding a scooter around the museum and working on his first big project: re-envisioning the Himalayan, South Asian and Southeast Asian galleries, which have mostly been untouched since the late 1990s, when they were installed on Mia's second floor by the museum's founding curator of Asian art, Robert Jacobsen.
Gandhi comes to Minneapolis by way of Atlanta, his hometown; London, where he did postgraduate work at the University of London's School of Oriental and African Studies; and Mumbai, where he has been traveling regularly since 2007 for curatorial work and research.
We caught up with him on a rainy afternoon, just as the ice was melting. The interview has been edited for clarity.
Q: What excites you most about Mia's South and Southeast Asian art collection?
A: We were the second museum in the country, after the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, to acquire a "Walking Shakyamuni Buddha" from Thailand. It's sort of an iconic image of him midstride with one hand in abhaya mudra [palm upraised]. … The arm sort of sways like an elephant's trunk. All these sort of aesthetic treatises of what the Buddha should be [are] typified in this sculpture.
When we got the [11th-century bronze] "Shiva Nataraja (Lord of the Dance)" in 1929, it was the third to be acquired by a U.S. institution. It is another iconic manifestation, of Shiva and his cosmic dance. It became incredibly popular during this particular period in Indian art under the Chola dynasty. The casting is done so well that it was sort of revelatory. Even Rodin, for example, was looking at Chola bronzes.
Bronzes of that period, of that subject, of that scale, are hard to come by these days, so we were lucky to get this. There were little moments of great ambition. It's 100 years later, but I think it is important to hold onto that. There are unique challenges to building a collection in the 21st century. One is just how much top-quality material is available. There are also the rules that we [now] abide by in terms of cultural property and archaeological material.