Hennepin County prosecutors are confident they have the right man convicted as a brutal 1980s Minneapolis serial killer, despite the findings of an inmate advocacy group casting doubt on the case through DNA evidence.
Billy Glaze, who is serving three life sentences for the high-profile murders of three American Indian women, should remain behind bars and doesn't need a new trial, prosecutors argued in court papers filed Friday afternoon. Glaze's case, they said, "is not a DNA exoneration case."
The jury saw "overwhelming evidence" of Glaze's guilt at his 1989 trial, prosecutors wrote. Glaze's own confessions before and after his conviction confirm his guilt and explain the lack of physical evidence at the scenes of the murders, they contend.
The Minnesota Innocence Project, a group dedicated to freeing innocent prisoners, is seeking a new trial for Glaze, who has spent more than 25 years behind bars for the murders. They argue there was no biological evidence linking Glaze to the crimes. New DNA tests of 39 items found at the murder scenes, including bodily fluids, clothing and other items, also found no link to Glaze, they said. Instead, the group argues, those tests implicate another man — a convicted Minnesota rapist whom they declined to identify publicly. They argued that Glaze's confessions were false.
Glaze's lawyers said in phone interviews Friday that they were disappointed with the state's response.
The filing "continues to rely upon discredited evidence," said Ed Magarian, a partner at the firm of Dorsey & Whitney who is working on the case with the Innocence Project.
A jury found Glaze, now 71, guilty of first- and second-degree murder in the bludgeoning deaths of Kathy Bullman, 19, Angeline Whitebird-Sweet, 26, and Angela Green, 21. The bodies of the women were found between July 1986 and April 1987 in three locations frequented by transients in Minneapolis. All three were found nude or mostly nude with their bodies positioned in ways that suggested a serial killer. The cases prompted intense media attention and public outcry, including allegations that police hadn't been aggressive in investigating crimes against Indians.
Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman said in a statement Friday that the Innocence Project's evidence is "inconclusive and unpersuasive" and doesn't meet the legal standards for a new trial.