Advertisement

Minnesota Court of Appeals rules Duluth had authority to reverse hotel project decision

The City Council last year reversed an environmental review decision made by a city-appointed citizen group.

The Minnesota Star Tribune
January 30, 2024 at 8:37PM
Duluth’s Miller Creek along Sundby Road, seen next to the Kohl’s department store. Across the road is the site of a hotel development. (Jana Hollingsworth)

DULUTH — The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled Monday that Duluth’s City Council didn’t err when it reversed its planning commission’s decision about the need for environmental review of a 100-room hotel development.

Opponents of an $18 million Duluth hotel project last year appealed to the court a council decision that said an Environmental Assessment Worksheet wasn’t necessary for a development near Miller Hill Mall and an impaired trout stream, Miller Creek.

Duluth resident and neighbor to the site Rebecca Mulenburg argued that the city shouldn’t have allowed the council authority to make the decision, among other claims listed in court documents. She contended it was up to the state court to hear appeals, per local and state laws. A city-appointed group of citizens that make up a commission for city development had initially directed hotel developer Kinseth Hospitality Cos. to conduct an EAW, prompting Kinseth’s appeal of that decision to the City Council.

City administration has said potential effects of hotel construction, such as warm-water runoff, would be controlled through provisions in the city zoning review and building permit process.

The court said the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board designated the city as the appropriate governmental unit to decide the need for an EAW, consistent with state and local law, including the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act.

“The relevant authorities contemplate a city, not a planning commission alone,” to be the responsible governmental body, Judge Peter Reyes Jr. wrote.

Jill Crawford-Nichols is another neighbor to the site who advocated for environmental review. She said the court’s decision weakens the state’s Environmental Quality Board.

“Now, any disgruntled developer can circumnavigate the EQB appeal process by challenging the decision internally and pass the burden of the court of appeals process back to the homeowner or environmental organization,” Crawford-Nichols said.

Advertisement

Mulenburg had also asked the City Council to approve a hold on work this past summer while the Appeals Court decided the case. The council said a bond was necessary to cover potential losses to the Iowa-based developer and required one for $1.6 million, which Mulenburg did not pay.

The project is underway. A spokeswoman for the city of Duluth declined to comment on the case and a representative for Kinseth didn’t immediately return a message.

Advertisement
about the writer

about the writer

Jana Hollingsworth

Duluth Reporter

Jana Hollingsworth is a reporter covering a range of topics in Duluth and northeastern Minnesota for the Star Tribune. Sign up to receive the new North Report newsletter.

See More

More from Duluth

card image

The proposal suggests removing the 20-year protection on the Superior National Forest that President Joe Biden’s administration had ordered in 2023.

Advertisement

To leave a comment, .

Advertisement
Advertisement